Sunday, January 25, 2009

A Patzer analyzing Master Games?

Silman suggests in an interview that an U1900 player should invest about 30% of the study time in analyzing master games and maybe 15% on Tactics. Does That make sense?

How should a patzer approach the task in an efficient way? I fear that you easily end up with some type of "learning-by-nodding".

No comments:

Post a Comment